How unemployment is individual and social problem Essay Example for Free

How unemployment is respective(prenominal) and social problem EssayIn this essay I will handle how unemployment is an individual and a social problem and how goo Weber distinguished power, dictum and coercion and how the functionalist, contradict theorist and symbolic fundamental interaction theory judgement the delivery and by the mid century how they shed evolved and the role of these theories to explain social and economic phenomenon. How unemployment is individual and social problem Unemployment is caused by m any(prenominal) factors in a modern market economy.It can be caused by rapid technological change, business rung or recessions, seasonal factors in some industries particularly such as changes in tastes and climatic conditions which affects fill for certain products and services, individual perceptions and willingness to work and search for jobs, their values and attitudes towards some jobs and about employers, accessibility for re prep and encyclopaedism of wor k skills, willingness and perception of unemployed of the benefits of training and the possibility for them to get a job after the training up to now though they project a chance to get a job, discrimination in the workplace based on race, color. religion, ethnicity, age and class.It can be seen from the above causes unemployment in a particular geological rate of flow can be a combination of caused by social factors and how the economy as a substantial workings and likewise due to the inherent individual factors. In a sociological point of view according to functionalist and run afoul theorists the unemployment is caused primarily by the social factors than by the individual factors. How ever according to Max Weber and symbolic interaction theories individuals construct their own social constructs and perception and they can be subjective in their behavior and there fore can become unemployed even though the material condition they can get a job in the job market.In summary applying the sociological and the primary causes of unemployment unemployment is individual as well as a social problem in a market economy. As discussed above it is caused by the society as well as by individuals. however the economy or societal factors are non present unemployment can be caused by individual perception and their own subjective behavior. . Max Webers distinction among power, authority and coercion proponent can be defined as one persons might to influence others does what ever they want even though they dont like to do what is demanded and they resist doing what is demanded. For example a professor can influence the students to assign work and demand them to do to satisfy some criteria.As well a dictator like Hitler can control all aspects of life because of this ability to confab his will on majority of people. In other words a person or mathematical group on other person or other groups can use power legitimately or illegitimately. That is power nee d not come from proper authority or legitimate authority. That is power and authority can be contrastive in this respect. According to Max Weber authority can fig up from tradition, charisma of certain powerful people or from legal-rational. That is authority need not come from any logical reason but likely to come from respect for the past times. For example a monarchy in horse opera Europe can get authority because they ruled the populace over a long period of time.Even the traditional authority can exist in modern democracies because the people respect the monarchy or authority of monarchy at least in a limited symbolic head of states in westerly Europe. Authority also can arise from charisma of some powerful people. They have authority because of their charisma. This arises because they have the ability to lead a vast number of people for a particular cause victimization their powerful charm and influence over ordinary people. For example Martin Luther King, Gandhi. Nelson M andela is the modern examples of charismatic authority they had because of their ability to charm and influence a vast majority of people for a particular cause. Authority also can arise from legal-rational. That is in society authority is given to individuals and organization based on rationally enacted laws and regulations.This authority is impersonal and differs from charismatic authority because the legal-rational authority is impersonal and the charismatic authority is personal and respect by the people who accept that authority. In modern societies the authority is derived from the legal-rational compared to charismatic and traditional in vary degrees in industrialized societies in particular. Coercion is the extreme manifestation of power in a government agency threatens the person to complete obedience because it threatens the person coerced physically, financially and socially. This results in persons following the authority of another because of business rather than wi ll.Coercion is mostly linked with abuse and conflict. Coercion exists in many dictatorships in the past as well as in the present orb in many parts of the world where citizens are forced to follow the regime of dictatorship. The view of the economy in the perspectives of functionalist, conflict theorists and symbolic interaction theory Functionalist perspective of the economy In the perspective of functionalist sociological theorist social outlines including economy works like a biological organism where every part of the strategy work in a united manner so that smooth functioning is maintained and so that society builds consensus between different parts of the strategy..In this change is evolutionary and the changes take place to minimize dysfunction and to enhance the stability and its survival in the future. In this respect Capitalism will not collapse and will pay in the future as the functions of the system will adjust and evolve so that it maintains the social dress and stability without any radical overhaul of the economic system. In addition the social, legal, political, religious systems will not be in conflict with the economic system and work in unison with the economic system so the whole social organism survive and social order is maintained and their functions and their purpose even though different work as a unified system.As discussed above this is the functionalist view of the economy. affair theorist view of the economy In contrast conflict theorist believe society do not work as a unified system. Conflict and struggle take place as different groups work to maximize their benefit in the same time other groups loose. Functionalist view conflict in a negative manner. However the conflict theorist see the conflict to some outcome is beneficial as it forces the parties to come to a common ground and make the economic system or the social system to change for the better and minimize the losers and maximizing the benefits for a greater num ber of groups as well make the power system in check so that abuse of power is minimized.In this context the economic system and social order changes continually and changes take place and shaped by different interest groups in varying degrees in a market economy. However Marxism as a conflict theory predicts radical change to the economic system to move towards a socialist system it has not eventuated. However Max Weber as a conflict theory predicts the viability of the market economy with some tidy to minimize the negative aspects of capitalism like alienation and the negative impact of bureaucracy in capitalist economies and more democracy in society and continuous reform of the economic system to make it work efficiently but also effectively by legal, social and political reform appropriate to a countries historical, cultural, political and social context.