Euphoria Case Study Essay Example for Free

euphoria Case Study EssayHuman bread and butter as we know has been proven better with a scientific discovery created through and through the efforts of Pseudoscience Research Inc. (PRI), a conglomerate pharmaceutical corporation responsible for other life-changing advances in modern biological science and engineering science today. This new discovery is guaranteed to purify the quality of life for roughly people and would eventually establish a harmonious society human beings aspire for since time immemorial. In a lavish ceremony held at the offices of PRI, the miracle medicate was unveiled to wide public acclaim. It was described as peerless of the most innovative and shiny invention of the 22nd century. The medicate Euphoria is generally regarded as the most effective and best-selling medicine since viagra hit the stores. Euphoria comes from the Greek word euphoros meaning healthy. As what its name espouses, Euphoria aims to improve the lives of the majority of peop le who live life in constant depression, poverty, and hunger by inducing inborn comfort and elation. Indeed, Euphoria changes everything. As a response to the growing demand in society, PRI started to conduct look on a dose that may well be the biological ubermensch of the masses in order to rid of constant financial, social, and personal problems that the individual has to experience on a daily basis. On July 14, 1971, PRI jumpstarted the research on a new medicine that will biologically eliminate problems and hardships of an individual by developing a pill concentrated with endorphins and other happiness-inducing chemicals that will harmlessly alter the genetic autograph of the person as well as increase the normal endorphin cypher of the normal human body.Thus, Euphoria was born. Since the drugs invention, it has been tested on human subjects to adhere to the pre-existing laws on animal welfare in situation with testing. During the early 90s, PRI was threatened with bankru ptcy as the company was openly criticized for making an amoral and immoral drug simultaneously. more often than not pro-life groups rejected the idea of the drug, as it did not value human life while intellectuals criticized it as something that is atrocious since it takes out choice of a person to be miserable. But it was a famous Hollywood actress who supported the drug and brought PRI into the A-list of corporations in the world today.The three-time Oscar winner actress argued publicly that the drug has helped her made her career and better her way of life ever since. Consequently, PRI sales on Euphoria went up by 50% in just a family and soon the company made a name for itself as one of the leading brands in healthcare in 2004. Today, Euphoria has replaced painkillers, anti-depressants, and other small-time antibiotics since it completely prevents the user from get sick. It has been proven effective with absolutely no side effects such as drowsiness, dizziness, stomach pains, office pains, headaches, fever, and death.Since its invention, the drug has been widely-used by the public and from substantial surveys conducted by PRI itself, it has been revealed that almost 95.457% of the population take the drug as an answer to the problems since on that point are no other drugs that will enable them to be happy and successful. In addition, that percentage likewise proves the drugs popularity and effectiveness, as it won numerous awards including the Discovery of the Year recognition from Time Magazine. In 2008, the drug established the name of PRI, becoming the worlds foremost conglomerate in medicinal development.Humble Beginnings The commendation with the creation of the phenomenal drug goes to Dr. William high-pitched, a Harvard medicine graduate, who got the sudden inspiration of cr consume Euphoria during a neighbourly banter over a couple of beers when his colleague suggested him to create a drug that has a pictorial high without the side effects rival to that of viagra and morphine. Because of his background as a distinguished graduate of one of the top universities in the world, his credibility follows with his invention and thereof the drugs eventual success. 1 He based his assumptions from an observational laboratory experiment wherein he carefully tested the number of endorphins that the human body produces at a normal rate. After determining such, he further experimented on the subject with three substantive theories. startle is to determine the amount of endorphins that a normal body produces when exercising. In a result published in the PRI research journal from 1991, Falsetto concluded that the body gives off 86% more endorphins that stimulate happiness and elation.2However, he debunked his theory stating that exercising is not an activity done by majority of the masses and would therefore cause a low selling and marketing rate. The second theory was to determine the amount of endorphins when eating large amoun ts of chocolate. The result was also promising but Falsetto soon discovered that chocolate-induced happiness is followed by undesirable side-effects such as diabetes and fluctuating sugar levels of the body. The last theory proved to be the most effective as Falsetto discovered that endorphins could be extracted as a solid powder draw and could be placed in regular tablets sold.The formula is of course under strict protection of the PRI, NSA, CIA, FBI, EUROPOL and the coupled Nations, but Falsetto disclosed in a press interview when the drug reached its 10th year of success that it contains naturally-produced endorphins that add to the natural threshold of the human body and it increases happiness that in turn causes motivation, energy, and a positivist attitude. He boldly added that the drug can replace viagra since it also increases the sexual wedge of the human body. Because of his background as a Harvard graduate, the credibility of the drug was never compromised when it went on sale since 1995.3 In relation with the drugs almost monumental failure, the Hollywood actress who still refuses to reveal her identity said that it almost salve her life and career. Since then, PRI inaugurated the celebrated actress as one of the chairpersons of the company and eventually her ascension as the CEO of the company. Her narrative reached almost the entirety of Hollywoods royalty and soon, millions of people were convinced of Euphoria. Heads of State and royal families soon followed suit, stating the drugs effectivity and modestness over decision-making, political relationships, and terrorist negotiations. The drug also replaced the harmful and illegal drugs such as cocaine and marihuana since Euphoria induced a natural high without the hallucinogens found in the illegal drugs. In 2001, 92% of the world population agreed on the use of Euphoria and consequently stamped out the drugs immoral and unethical issues regarding its use and nature. The test subjects widely accepted the drug4 since the drug contains natural endorphins, and it follows that it marginally increases elation and happiness speck for the person. Since happiness and elation are important for personal motivation, the drug then helps in changing the predilection of the person as well as affecting change with regards to eating habits and behavior.Also, work production has also been increased since employees are now very happy with their work. Euphoria also replaces viagra as a safe alternative since the drug is naturally produced. With health issues, endorphins also increase the white blood count of the body and therefore prevent the body from acquiring diseases.5 Majority of the people agree on the drug since it is right for the body and life as well as the right thing to do. Its moral issues were disproved since there are no deaths or accidents that are linked to the drug.6 In 1992, there was a worldwide draw to governments that the standard of living for most of the countr ies is declining because of unemployment and poverty. However, as soon as Euphoria was introduced to the world, many agree that the drug has saved many lives. It is noteworthy to mention that in one of the political debates in the UN meeting of 2007, the aggregation concluded that the quality of life is steadily declining and if the typeface is not addressed, more human lives are at stake. Either the drug should be globally legalized or the world would continue to degrade in term of living standards and health issues. Naturally, the drug was finally given worldwide approval during September of that year, and since then, it has been proven effective.7However, some(prenominal) pharmaceutical companies rejected the claim of Euphoria to be a universal solution for biological problems. The case went to court, but it was easily dismissed by the ruling that there were no substantive claims to prove that the drug was indeed ineffective. Consequently, it also proved to be the turning poi nt for major and minor drug companies as PRI bought the companies and formed into a multi-national biological research company.8 Furthermore, since there are contentions with regards the effects of the medicine, it has concluded that the medicines claims are true. Mr. Falsetto received the Nobel Peace prize for Medicine and named one of the 22nd centurys greatest thinkers.9 Because of Euphorias discovery and monumental success, it has been regarded as the drug that saved the world from misery and caused much development in the quality of living for the hearty world. There are no more wars, political maneuvering, strife, poverty, and colds. The global quality of life has improved, notable through the many recent milestones in human history such as excessive singing, the development of the remediation against AIDS and HIV, and a harmonious societal structure where there is no class struggle and estrangement since everybody is equally happy. Thanks to Dr. Willam Falsetoo, the world i s now a better place.101 Ad Hominem (Argument to the Man)2 Error of Fact3 wobbly Analogy4 Ad Populum (Appeal to the Masses)5 Hasty Generalization6 Equivocation7 False Dichotomy8 Appeal to Ignorance9 Burden of demonstration10 Post Hoc (False Cause)